Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show forum version information on web pages #317

Open
sschwarzer opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Show forum version information on web pages #317

sschwarzer opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@sschwarzer
Copy link

Maybe apart from a release/deployment announcement in the Nim Forum, I haven't seen a way to know the actually deployed version of the forum. Therefore, when issues are reported and fixed, users of the website never know if the deployed forum is supposed to have these issues fixed/implemented.

With this information, a user could distinguish between the fix not being implemented yet vs. presumably implemented, but not working for the user. So in the second case, users could report if "their" issue hasn't been solved by the presumed fix or feature implementation.

The version information could be something as simple as the current commit hash, or preferably the actual version number (as long as the deployed version is exactly this version, not the stated version with additional commits). This hash/version information could be displayed at the bottom of the main page or on all pages.

@pietroppeter
Copy link

I have checked how discourse does it and they had the version info and commit hash in a meta generator field: https://meta.discourse.org/t/find-what-version-of-discourse-youre-using/104326

Just to double check I looked into what Julia is using and this is their meta:

<meta name="generator" content="Discourse 3.0.0.beta16 - https://github.com/discourse/discourse version 7b5f7b4484db9afc0b7e5cd0bb497b705009e82a">

I think this should be an easy way to do it. We do not really need to have it in the user interface.

@pietroppeter
Copy link

noting down what we would need to change:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants